Single Path One-Shot (SPOS)

Introduction

Proposed in Single Path One-Shot Neural Architecture Search with Uniform Sampling is a one-shot NAS method that addresses the difficulties in training One-Shot NAS models by constructing a simplified supernet trained with an uniform path sampling method, so that all underlying architectures (and their weights) get trained fully and equally. An evolutionary algorithm is then applied to efficiently search for the best-performing architectures without any fine tuning.

Implementation on NNI is based on official repo. We implement a trainer that trains the supernet and a evolution tuner that leverages the power of NNI framework that speeds up the evolutionary search phase.

Examples

Here is a use case, which is the search space in paper. However, we applied latency limit instead of flops limit to perform the architecture search phase.

Example code

Requirements

Prepare ImageNet in the standard format (follow the script here). Linking it to data/imagenet will be more convenient.

Download the checkpoint file from here (maintained by Megvii) if you don’t want to retrain the supernet. Put checkpoint-150000.pth.tar under data directory.

After preparation, it’s expected to have the following code structure:

spos
├── architecture_final.json
├── blocks.py
├── data
│   ├── imagenet
│   │   ├── train
│   │   └── val
│   └── checkpoint-150000.pth.tar
├── network.py
├── readme.md
├── supernet.py
├── evaluation.py
├── search.py
└── utils.py

Step 1. Train Supernet

python supernet.py

Will export the checkpoint to checkpoints directory, for the next step.

NOTE: The data loading used in the official repo is slightly different from usual, as they use BGR tensor and keep the values between 0 and 255 intentionally to align with their own DL framework. The option --spos-preprocessing will simulate the behavior used originally and enable you to use the checkpoints pretrained.

Step 3. Train for Evaluation

python evaluation.py

By default, it will use architecture_final.json. This architecture is provided by the official repo (converted into NNI format). You can use any architecture (e.g., the architecture found in step 2) with --fixed-arc option.

Reference

PyTorch

class nni.retiarii.oneshot.pytorch.SinglePathTrainer(model, loss, metrics, optimizer, num_epochs, dataset_train, dataset_valid, batch_size=64, workers=4, device=None, log_frequency=None)[source]

Single-path trainer. Samples a path every time and backpropagates on that path.

Parameters
  • model (nn.Module) – Model with mutables.

  • loss (callable) – Called with logits and targets. Returns a loss tensor.

  • metrics (callable) – Returns a dict that maps metrics keys to metrics data.

  • optimizer (Optimizer) – Optimizer that optimizes the model.

  • num_epochs (int) – Number of epochs of training.

  • dataset_train (Dataset) – Dataset of training.

  • dataset_valid (Dataset) – Dataset of validation.

  • batch_size (int) – Batch size.

  • workers (int) – Number of threads for data preprocessing. Not used for this trainer. Maybe removed in future.

  • device (torch.device) – Device object. Either torch.device("cuda") or torch.device("cpu"). When None, trainer will automatic detects GPU and selects GPU first.

  • log_frequency (int) – Number of mini-batches to log metrics.

Known Limitations

  • Block search only. Channel search is not supported yet.

  • In the search phase, training from the scratch is required. Inheriting weights from supernet is not supported yet.

Current Reproduction Results

Reproduction is still undergoing. Due to the gap between official release and original paper, we compare our current results with official repo (our run) and paper.

  • Evolution phase is almost aligned with official repo. Our evolution algorithm shows a converging trend and reaches ~65% accuracy at the end of search. Nevertheless, this result is not on par with paper. For details, please refer to this issue.

  • Retrain phase is not aligned. Our retraining code, which uses the architecture released by the authors, reaches 72.14% accuracy, still having a gap towards 73.61% by official release and 74.3% reported in original paper.